Google Health (Fitbit) vs Intermittent Fasting Tracker:
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google
App Store
$1.43M/mo
~$17.12M/yr · 101.5M installs
VS
Intermittent Fasting Tracker:
Kai Oelfke
App Store
$313.6K/mo
~$3.76M/yr · 5.3M installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+355% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+1807% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+419% vs other
Rating winner
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: wins
+8% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 5× more per month than Intermittent Fasting Tracker: - $1.43M vs $313.6K.
- Premium pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) charges $9.99/mo vs Intermittent Fasting Tracker:'s $0.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~101.5M lifetime installs vs Intermittent Fasting Tracker:'s ~5.3M - 19.1× the funnel top.
- Charts placement. Google Health (Fitbit) ranks #91 on the US grossing chart (the other app is unranked) - chart placement is a self-reinforcing flywheel.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Google Health (Fitbit)
vs
Intermittent Fasting Tracker:
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.43M
◀
$313.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$17.12M
◀
$3.76M
Lifetime installs (est.)
101.5M
◀
5.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
7.2M
◀
1.4M
App Store rating
4.49★
▶
4.87★
Total ratings
677K
◀
48K
US grossing rank
#91
◀
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
◀
$0.99
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
▶
8 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 548.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.02.1
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 13, 2023
- Last updated
- Feb 26, 2026
- File size
- 92.1 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 0.0.96
- Languages
- Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish +22 more
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Google Health (Fitbit) or Intermittent Fasting Tracker:? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $1.43M per month, while Intermittent Fasting Tracker: earns about $313.6K. That is a 4.6× revenue gap (~$1.11M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $17.12M/year, Intermittent Fasting Tracker: ≈ $3.76M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google Health (Fitbit) or Intermittent Fasting Tracker:? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.5M estimated downloads vs 5.3M for Intermittent Fasting Tracker: - a 19.1× gap. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 677K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Intermittent Fasting Tracker:'s App Store downloads are estimated from 48K ratings.
Are Google Health (Fitbit) and Intermittent Fasting Tracker: in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google Health (Fitbit) and Intermittent Fasting Tracker: offer? v
Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range 2 tiers detected. Intermittent Fasting Tracker:: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Google Health (Fitbit) runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo) · calibrated by US grossing rank #91" monetization model; Intermittent Fasting Tracker: runs "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) or Intermittent Fasting Tracker:? v
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: Google Health (Fitbit) 677K ratings, Intermittent Fasting Tracker: 48K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google Health (Fitbit) vs Intermittent Fasting Tracker: revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.43M for Google Health (Fitbit) and $313.6K for Intermittent Fasting Tracker: are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google Health (Fitbit) or Intermittent Fasting Tracker: to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.