Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Ivy: Processed Food Scanner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$2.71M/mo
~$32.47M/yr · 98.7M installs
VS
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner
Ivy Apps Ltd
Google Play
$16.5K/mo
~$198.1K/yr · 151K installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+16290% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+65320% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+43173% vs other
Rating winner
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner wins
+2% vs other
Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 164× more per month than Ivy: Processed Food Scanner - $2.71M vs $16.5K.
- Aggressive pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $17.30/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs Ivy: Processed Food Scanner's ~151K - 654.2× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
vs
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.71M
◀
$16.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$32.47M
◀
$198.1K
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.7M
◀
151K
Monthly active users (est.)?
12.5M
◀
29K
App Store rating
4.53★
▶
4.62★
Total ratings
658K
◀
8K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
▶
$17.30
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 10, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 12, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.3.7
- Languages
- -
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Ivy: Processed Food Scanner? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $2.71M per month, while Ivy: Processed Food Scanner earns about $16.5K. That is a 163.9× revenue gap (~$2.69M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $32.47M/year, Ivy: Processed Food Scanner ≈ $198.1K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Ivy: Processed Food Scanner? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 151K for Ivy: Processed Food Scanner - a 654.2× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Ivy: Processed Food Scanner reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Ivy: Processed Food Scanner in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Ivy: Processed Food Scanner offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Ivy: Processed Food Scanner: IAP range $5.99 - $49.99 per item. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; Ivy: Processed Food Scanner runs "Subscription (~$17.30/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Ivy: Processed Food Scanner? v
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings, Ivy: Processed Food Scanner 92 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Ivy: Processed Food Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.71M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $16.5K for Ivy: Processed Food Scanner are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Ivy: Processed Food Scanner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.