Google Health (Fitbit) vs Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google
App Store
$1.43M/mo
~$17.12M/yr · 101.5M installs
VS
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter
Lifesum AB
App Store
$550.0K/mo
~$6.60M/yr · 6.7M installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+159% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+1405% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+271% vs other
Rating winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter wins
+3% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 3× more per month than Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter - $1.43M vs $550.0K.
- Premium pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) charges $9.99/mo vs Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter's $5.83/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~101.5M lifetime installs vs Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter's ~6.7M - 15.0× the funnel top.
- Charts placement. Google Health (Fitbit) ranks #91 on the US grossing chart (the other app is unranked) - chart placement is a self-reinforcing flywheel.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Google Health (Fitbit)
vs
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.43M
◀
$550.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$17.12M
◀
$6.60M
Lifetime installs (est.)
101.5M
◀
6.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
7.2M
◀
1.9M
App Store rating
4.49★
▶
4.65★
Total ratings
677K
◀
150K
US grossing rank
#91
◀
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
◀
$5.83
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
▶
5 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 548.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.02.1
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 5, 2019
- Last updated
- Jun 11, 2026
- File size
- 231.1 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 23.10.0
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +8 more
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Google Health (Fitbit) or Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $1.43M per month, while Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter earns about $550.0K. That is a 2.6× revenue gap (~$877.1K more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $17.12M/year, Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $6.60M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google Health (Fitbit) or Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.5M estimated downloads vs 6.7M for Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter - a 15.0× gap. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 677K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 150K ratings.
Are Google Health (Fitbit) and Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google Health (Fitbit) and Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter offer? v
Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range 2 tiers detected. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Google Health (Fitbit) runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo) · calibrated by US grossing rank #91" monetization model; Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$5.83/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) or Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Google Health (Fitbit) 677K ratings, Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter 150K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google Health (Fitbit) vs Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.43M for Google Health (Fitbit) and $550.0K for Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google Health (Fitbit) or Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.