Google Health (Fitbit) vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google
App Store
$1.56M/mo
~$18.67M/yr · 101.6M installs
VS
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
MacrosFirst, Inc.
Google Play
$50.8K/mo
~$610.1K/yr · 329K installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+2960% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+30757% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+9996% vs other
Rating winner
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins
+5% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 31× more per month than MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker - $1.56M vs $50.8K.
- Aggressive pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $23.65/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~101.6M lifetime installs vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's ~329K - 308.6× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Google Health (Fitbit)
vs
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.56M
◀
$50.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$18.67M
◀
$610.1K
Lifetime installs (est.)
101.6M
◀
329K
Monthly active users (est.)?
7.2M
◀
71K
App Store rating
4.49★
▶
4.71★
Total ratings
677K
◀
5K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
▶
$23.65
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 548.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.02.1
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 14, 2017
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.1.679
- Languages
- -
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Google Health (Fitbit) or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $1.56M per month, while MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker earns about $50.8K. That is a 30.6× revenue gap (~$1.51M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $18.67M/year, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker ≈ $610.1K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google Health (Fitbit) or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.6M estimated downloads vs 329K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker - a 308.6× gap. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 677K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Google Health (Fitbit) and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google Health (Fitbit) and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker offer? v
Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range 2 tiers detected. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker: IAP range $6.99 - $79.99 per item. Google Health (Fitbit) runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$23.65/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Google Health (Fitbit) 677K ratings, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker 527 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google Health (Fitbit) vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.56M for Google Health (Fitbit) and $50.8K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google Health (Fitbit) or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.