Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$2.71M/mo
~$32.51M/yr · 98.8M installs
VS
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
MacrosFirst, Inc.
App Store
$93.8K/mo
~$1.13M/yr · 551K installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+2790% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+17828% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+7671% vs other
Rating winner
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins
+7% vs other
Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 29× more per month than MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker - $2.71M vs $93.8K.
- Aggressive pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $11.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.8M lifetime installs vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's ~551K - 179.3× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
vs
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.71M
◀
$93.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$32.51M
◀
$1.13M
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.8M
◀
551K
Monthly active users (est.)?
12.5M
◀
161K
App Store rating
4.53★
▶
4.86★
Total ratings
659K
◀
16K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
▶
$11.99
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 174.2 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.1.590
- Languages
- English
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $2.71M per month, while MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker earns about $93.8K. That is a 28.9× revenue gap (~$2.62M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $32.51M/year, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.13M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.8M estimated downloads vs 551K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker - a 179.3× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 659K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.99/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 659K ratings, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker 16K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.71M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $93.8K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.