Google Health (Fitbit) vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google
App Store
$1.55M/mo
~$18.61M/yr · 101.2M installs
VS
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
MacrosFirst, Inc.
App Store
$107.1K/mo
~$1.29M/yr · 629K installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+1348% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+15977% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+3796% vs other
Rating winner
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins
+8% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 14× more per month than MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker - $1.55M vs $107.1K.
- Aggressive pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $11.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~101.2M lifetime installs vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's ~629K - 160.8× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Google Health (Fitbit)
vs
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.55M
◀
$107.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$18.61M
◀
$1.29M
Lifetime installs (est.)
101.2M
◀
629K
Monthly active users (est.)?
7.2M
◀
184K
App Store rating
4.49★
▶
4.86★
Total ratings
675K
◀
18K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
▶
$11.99
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 548.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.02.1
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 183.7 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.1.668
- Languages
- English
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Google Health (Fitbit) or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $1.55M per month, while MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker earns about $107.1K. That is a 14.5× revenue gap (~$1.44M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $18.61M/year, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.29M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google Health (Fitbit) or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.2M estimated downloads vs 629K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker - a 160.8× gap. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 675K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 18K ratings.
Are Google Health (Fitbit) and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google Health (Fitbit) and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker offer? v
Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range 2 tiers detected. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Google Health (Fitbit) runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.99/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: Google Health (Fitbit) 675K ratings, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker 18K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google Health (Fitbit) vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.55M for Google Health (Fitbit) and $107.1K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google Health (Fitbit) or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.