Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Malakoff Humanis

Fitbit: Health & Fitness

Google
App Store
$2.71M/mo
~$32.47M/yr · 98.7M installs
VS

Malakoff Humanis

Malakoff Humanis
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 803K installs
Revenue winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +270569400% vs other
Installs winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +12181% vs other
MAU winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +7858% vs other
Rating winner Malakoff Humanis wins +7% vs other

Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 2705694× more per month than Malakoff Humanis - $2.71M vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a $9.99/mo subscription that compounds; Malakoff Humanis relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs Malakoff Humanis's ~803K - 122.8× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Fitbit: Health & Fitness
vs
Malakoff Humanis
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.71M
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$32.47M
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.7M
803K
Monthly active users (est.)?
12.5M
157K
App Store rating
4.53★
4.86★
Total ratings
658K
68K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
No sub
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
0 tiers

Fitbit: Health & Fitness

Google
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Oct 18, 2011
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
450.2 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
4.69
Languages
Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
View full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report →

Malakoff Humanis

Malakoff Humanis
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
-
Last updated
Feb 6, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
2.23.1-2849
Languages
-
View full Malakoff Humanis report →

Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Malakoff Humanis trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Malakoff Humanis? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $2.71M per month, while Malakoff Humanis earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$2.71M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $32.47M/year, Malakoff Humanis ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Malakoff Humanis? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 803K for Malakoff Humanis - a 122.8× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Malakoff Humanis reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Malakoff Humanis in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Malakoff Humanis offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Malakoff Humanis: no IAP detected on the public listing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; Malakoff Humanis runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Malakoff Humanis? v
Malakoff Humanis edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings, Malakoff Humanis 3 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Malakoff Humanis revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.71M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $0 for Malakoff Humanis are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Malakoff Humanis to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.