Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$5.41M/mo
~$64.94M/yr · 98.7M installs
VS
MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker
Meteor AI Apps & Games
App Store
$9/mo
~$111/yr · 200 installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+60126444% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+49331450% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+51344983% vs other
Rating winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+453% vs other
Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 601265× more per month than MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker - $5.41M vs $9.
- Aggressive pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $12.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker's ~200 - 493315.5× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Fitbit: Health & Fitness sits at 4.53★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
vs
MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.41M
◀
$9
Annual revenue (est.)
$64.94M
◀
$111
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.7M
◀
200
Monthly active users (est.)?
25.2M
◀
49
App Store rating
4.53★
◀
-
Total ratings
658K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
▶
$12.99
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
▶
4 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 25, 2025
- Last updated
- Nov 25, 2025
- File size
- 42.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.0
- Languages
- English
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $5.41M per month, while MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker earns about $9. That is a 601265.4× revenue gap (~$5.41M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $64.94M/year, MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker ≈ $111/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 200 for MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker - a 493315.5× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$5.83/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.5 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings, MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.41M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $9 for MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or MealScan: AI Calorie Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.