Google Health (Fitbit) vs OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google
App Store
$1.56M/mo
~$18.67M/yr · 101.6M installs
VS
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner
AIBY
App Store
$653.5K/mo
~$7.84M/yr · 3.6M installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+138% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+2706% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+672% vs other
Rating winner
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner wins
+4% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 2× more per month than OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner - $1.56M vs $653.5K.
- Aggressive pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $21.68/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~101.6M lifetime installs vs OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner's ~3.6M - 28.1× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.56M
◀
$653.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$18.67M
◀
$7.84M
Lifetime installs (est.)
101.6M
◀
3.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
7.2M
◀
934K
App Store rating
4.49★
▶
4.69★
Total ratings
677K
◀
33K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
▶
$21.68
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
▶
8 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 548.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.02.1
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 14, 2022
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 115.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.3
- Languages
- Arabic, English, Portuguese, Spanish
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Google Health (Fitbit) or OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $1.56M per month, while OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner earns about $653.5K. That is a 2.4× revenue gap (~$902.4K more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $18.67M/year, OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner ≈ $7.84M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google Health (Fitbit) or OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.6M estimated downloads vs 3.6M for OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner - a 28.1× gap. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 677K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner's App Store downloads are estimated from 33K ratings.
Are Google Health (Fitbit) and OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google Health (Fitbit) and OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner offer? v
Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range 2 tiers detected. OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Google Health (Fitbit) runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner runs "Subscription (~$21.68/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) or OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner? v
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Google Health (Fitbit) 677K ratings, OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner 33K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google Health (Fitbit) vs OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.56M for Google Health (Fitbit) and $653.5K for OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google Health (Fitbit) or OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
