Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$5.41M/mo
~$64.94M/yr · 98.7M installs
VS
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner
AIBY
App Store
$645.9K/mo
~$7.75M/yr · 3.6M installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+738% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+2658% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+2626% vs other
Rating winner
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner wins
+4% vs other
Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 8× more per month than OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner - $5.41M vs $645.9K.
- Aggressive pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $21.68/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner's ~3.6M - 27.6× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
vs
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.41M
◀
$645.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$64.94M
◀
$7.75M
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.7M
◀
3.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
25.2M
◀
923K
App Store rating
4.53★
▶
4.69★
Total ratings
658K
◀
33K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
▶
$21.68
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
▶
8 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 14, 2022
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 113.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.1
- Languages
- Arabic, English, Portuguese, Spanish
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $5.41M per month, while OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner earns about $645.9K. That is a 8.4× revenue gap (~$4.77M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $64.94M/year, OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner ≈ $7.75M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 3.6M for OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner - a 27.6× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner's App Store downloads are estimated from 33K ratings.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner runs "Subscription (~$21.68/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner? v
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings, OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner 33K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.41M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $645.9K for OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.