Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs PSL - Looksmax & Ascend
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$2.71M/mo
~$32.51M/yr · 98.8M installs
VS
PSL - Looksmax & Ascend
IQ Labs LLC
Google Play
$45.7K/mo
~$547.9K/yr · 418K installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+5834% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+23526% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+15527% vs other
Rating winner
PSL - Looksmax & Ascend wins
+1% vs other
Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 59× more per month than PSL - Looksmax & Ascend - $2.71M vs $45.7K.
- Aggressive pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $14.13/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.8M lifetime installs vs PSL - Looksmax & Ascend's ~418K - 236.3× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
vs
PSL - Looksmax & Ascend
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.71M
◀
$45.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$32.51M
◀
$547.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.8M
◀
418K
Monthly active users (est.)?
12.5M
◀
80K
App Store rating
4.53★
▶
4.59★
Total ratings
659K
◀
20K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
▶
$14.13
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 30, 2025
- Last updated
- Jan 29, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.1.5
- Languages
- -
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
PSL - Looksmax & Ascend trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or PSL - Looksmax & Ascend? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $2.71M per month, while PSL - Looksmax & Ascend earns about $45.7K. That is a 59.3× revenue gap (~$2.66M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $32.51M/year, PSL - Looksmax & Ascend ≈ $547.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or PSL - Looksmax & Ascend? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.8M estimated downloads vs 418K for PSL - Looksmax & Ascend - a 236.3× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 659K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PSL - Looksmax & Ascend reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and PSL - Looksmax & Ascend in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and PSL - Looksmax & Ascend offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. PSL - Looksmax & Ascend: IAP range $4.99 - $39.99 per item. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; PSL - Looksmax & Ascend runs "Subscription (~$14.13/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or PSL - Looksmax & Ascend? v
PSL - Looksmax & Ascend edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 659K ratings, PSL - Looksmax & Ascend 72 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs PSL - Looksmax & Ascend revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.71M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $45.7K for PSL - Looksmax & Ascend are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or PSL - Looksmax & Ascend to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.