Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker

Fitbit: Health & Fitness

Google
App Store
$2.71M/mo
~$32.47M/yr · 98.7M installs
VS

SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker

Kim Yunhoo
App Store
$1.1K/mo
~$13.3K/yr · 10K installs
Revenue winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +243437% vs other
Installs winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +967185% vs other
MAU winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +474206% vs other
Rating winner SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker wins +6% vs other

Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 2435× more per month than SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker - $2.71M vs $1.1K.
  2. Premium pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness charges $9.99/mo vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker's $3.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker's ~10K - 9672.9× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Fitbit: Health & Fitness
vs
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.71M
$1.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$32.47M
$13.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.7M
10K
Monthly active users (est.)?
12.5M
3K
App Store rating
4.53★
4.78★
Total ratings
658K
204
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
$3.99
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
3 tiers

Fitbit: Health & Fitness

Google
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Oct 18, 2011
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
450.2 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
4.69
Languages
Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
View full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report →

SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker

Kim Yunhoo
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jun 16, 2019
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
88.6 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
3.302
Languages
English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean +5 more
View full SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker report →

Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $2.71M per month, while SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker earns about $1.1K. That is a 2435.4× revenue gap (~$2.70M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $32.47M/year, SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker ≈ $13.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 10K for SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker - a 9672.9× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 204 ratings.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker runs "Subscription (~$12.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker? v
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings, SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker 204 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.71M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $1.1K for SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.