Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Six Pack in 30 Days
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$2.71M/mo
~$32.47M/yr · 98.7M installs
VS
Six Pack in 30 Days
Leap Fitness Group
Google Play
$5.63M/mo
~$67.52M/yr · 209.0M installs
Revenue winner
Six Pack in 30 Days wins
+108% vs other
Installs winner
Six Pack in 30 Days wins
+112% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+46% vs other
Rating winner
Six Pack in 30 Days wins
+9% vs other
Why Six Pack in 30 Days is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Six Pack in 30 Days earns roughly 2× more per month than Fitbit: Health & Fitness - $5.63M vs $2.71M.
- Premium pricing. Six Pack in 30 Days charges $19.98/mo vs Fitbit: Health & Fitness's $9.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Six Pack in 30 Days has ~209.0M lifetime installs vs Fitbit: Health & Fitness's ~98.7M - 2.1× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Six Pack in 30 Days sits at 4.93★ vs 4.53★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Six Pack in 30 Days report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
vs
Six Pack in 30 Days
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.71M
▶
$5.63M
Annual revenue (est.)
$32.47M
▶
$67.52M
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.7M
▶
209.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
12.5M
◀
8.6M
App Store rating
4.53★
▶
4.93★
Total ratings
658K
▶
2.8M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
▶
$19.98
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 9, 2018
- Last updated
- Mar 19, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.4.5
- Languages
- -
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
Six Pack in 30 Days trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Six Pack in 30 Days? v
Six Pack in 30 Days earns about $5.63M per month, while Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $2.71M. That is a 2.1× revenue gap (~$2.92M more per month for Six Pack in 30 Days). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $32.47M/year, Six Pack in 30 Days ≈ $67.52M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Six Pack in 30 Days? v
Six Pack in 30 Days leads with about 209.0M estimated downloads vs 98.7M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness - a 2.1× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Six Pack in 30 Days reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Six Pack in 30 Days in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Six Pack in 30 Days offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Six Pack in 30 Days: IAP range $4.99 - $79.99 per item. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; Six Pack in 30 Days runs "Subscription (~$19.98/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Six Pack in 30 Days? v
Six Pack in 30 Days edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings, Six Pack in 30 Days 57K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Six Pack in 30 Days revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.71M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $5.63M for Six Pack in 30 Days are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Six Pack in 30 Days to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.