Google Health (Fitbit) vs WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google
App Store
$1.36M/mo
~$16.32M/yr · 101.5M installs
VS
WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker
Joyride GmbH
Google Play
$45.9K/mo
~$550.5K/yr · 372K installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+2865% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+27179% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+8825% vs other
Rating winner
WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker wins
+4% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 30× more per month than WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker - $1.36M vs $45.9K.
- Aggressive pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $11.60/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~101.5M lifetime installs vs WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker's ~372K - 272.8× the funnel top.
- Charts placement. Google Health (Fitbit) ranks #94 on the US grossing chart (the other app is unranked) - chart placement is a self-reinforcing flywheel.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Google Health (Fitbit)
vs
WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.36M
◀
$45.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$16.32M
◀
$550.5K
Lifetime installs (est.)
101.5M
◀
372K
Monthly active users (est.)?
7.2M
◀
81K
App Store rating
4.49★
▶
4.67★
Total ratings
677K
◀
8K
US grossing rank
#94
◀
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
▶
$11.60
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 548.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.02.1
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 7, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 202606.1.5
- Languages
- -
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Google Health (Fitbit) or WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $1.36M per month, while WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker earns about $45.9K. That is a 29.7× revenue gap (~$1.31M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $16.32M/year, WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker ≈ $550.5K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google Health (Fitbit) or WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.5M estimated downloads vs 372K for WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker - a 272.8× gap. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 677K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Google Health (Fitbit) and WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google Health (Fitbit) and WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker offer? v
Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range 2 tiers detected. WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker: IAP range $2.99 - $44.99 per item. Google Health (Fitbit) runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo) · calibrated by US grossing rank #94" monetization model; WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.60/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) or WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker? v
WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Google Health (Fitbit) 677K ratings, WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker 54 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google Health (Fitbit) vs WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.36M for Google Health (Fitbit) and $45.9K for WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google Health (Fitbit) or WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.