Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$2.71M/mo
~$32.47M/yr · 98.7M installs
VS
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness
Zwift, Inc
App Store
$390.2K/mo
~$4.68M/yr · 2.3M installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+593% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+4122% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+1979% vs other
Rating winner
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness wins
+5% vs other
Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 7× more per month than Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness - $2.71M vs $390.2K.
- Aggressive pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $19.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness's ~2.3M - 42.2× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.71M
◀
$390.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$32.47M
◀
$4.68M
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.7M
◀
2.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
12.5M
◀
603K
App Store rating
4.53★
▶
4.74★
Total ratings
658K
◀
21K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
▶
$19.99
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 10, 2016
- Last updated
- Apr 22, 2026
- File size
- 3.52 GB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.112.0
- Languages
- English
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $2.71M per month, while Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness earns about $390.2K. That is a 6.9× revenue gap (~$2.32M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $32.47M/year, Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness ≈ $4.68M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 2.3M for Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness - a 42.2× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 21K ratings.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness runs "Subscription (~$19.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness? v
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings, Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness 21K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.71M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $390.2K for Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
