Fitdays vs Google Fit: Activity Tracking

Google Fit: Activity Tracking earns about $0 per month, while Fitdays earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: Fitdays ≈ $0/year, Google Fit: Activity Tracking ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Google Fit: Activity Tracking leads with about 349.8M estimated downloads vs 6.2M for Fitdays - a 56.6× gap. Fitdays reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Google Fit: Activity Tracking reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Fitdays does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Google Fit: Activity Tracking does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Fitdays runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Google Fit: Activity Tracking runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".

Google Fit: Activity Tracking edges ahead with ★ 3.5 vs ★ 3.3 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Fitdays 701 ratings, Google Fit: Activity Tracking 29K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Fitdays and $0 for Google Fit: Activity Tracking are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.