Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet vs InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet
Nutrition Technologies
App Store
$39.9K/mo
~$478.4K/yr · 374K installs
VS
InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor
AIBY
App Store
$1.27M/mo
~$15.21M/yr · 26.2M installs
Revenue winner
InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor wins
+3080% vs other
Installs winner
InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor wins
+6902% vs other
MAU winner
InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor wins
+6042% vs other
Rating winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet wins
+5% vs other
Why InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor earns roughly 32× more per month than Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet - $1.27M vs $39.9K.
- Aggressive pricing. InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor undercuts at $5.83/mo vs $19.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor has ~26.2M lifetime installs vs Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet's ~374K - 70.0× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$39.9K
▶
$1.27M
Annual revenue (est.)
$478.4K
▶
$15.21M
Lifetime installs (est.)
374K
▶
26.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
110K
▶
6.7M
App Store rating
4.88★
◀
4.64★
Total ratings
11K
▶
175K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
$5.83
IAP tiers detected
5 tiers
◀
4 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 10, 2019
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 179.4 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 23.0.5
- Languages
- English, Spanish
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 7, 2019
- Last updated
- Oct 22, 2025
- File size
- 87.1 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.63
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +7 more
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet trajectory
InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet or InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor? v
InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor earns about $1.27M per month, while Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet earns about $39.9K. That is a 31.8× revenue gap (~$1.23M more per month for InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor). Annual revenue: Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet ≈ $478.4K/year, InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor ≈ $15.21M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet or InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor? v
InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor leads with about 26.2M estimated downloads vs 374K for Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet - a 70.0× gap. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet's App Store downloads are estimated from 11K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor's App Store downloads are estimated from 175K ratings.
Are Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet and InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet and InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor offer? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet: IAP range 5 tiers detected. InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet runs a "Subscription (~$7.50/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor runs "Subscription (~$5.83/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet or InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet 11K ratings, InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor 175K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet vs InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $39.9K for Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet and $1.27M for InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet or InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
