Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet
Nutrition Technologies
App Store
$40.6K/mo
~$487.1K/yr · 381K installs
VS
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
MacrosFirst, Inc.
App Store
$93.8K/mo
~$1.13M/yr · 551K installs
Revenue winner
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins
+131% vs other
Installs winner
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins
+45% vs other
MAU winner
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins
+45% vs other
Rating winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet wins
+0% vs other
Why MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker earns roughly 2× more per month than Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet - $93.8K vs $40.6K.
- Aggressive pricing. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker undercuts at $11.99/mo vs $19.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet
vs
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$40.6K
▶
$93.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$487.1K
▶
$1.13M
Lifetime installs (est.)
381K
▶
551K
Monthly active users (est.)?
112K
▶
161K
App Store rating
4.88★
◀
4.86★
Total ratings
11K
▶
16K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
$11.99
IAP tiers detected
5 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 10, 2019
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 179.4 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 23.0.5
- Languages
- English, Spanish
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 174.2 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.1.590
- Languages
- English
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet trajectory
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker earns about $93.8K per month, while Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet earns about $40.6K. That is a 2.3× revenue gap (~$53.2K more per month for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker). Annual revenue: Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet ≈ $487.1K/year, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.13M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker leads with about 551K estimated downloads vs 381K for Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet - a 1.4× gap. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet's App Store downloads are estimated from 11K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings.
Are Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker offer? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet: IAP range 5 tiers detected. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet runs a "Subscription (~$7.50/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.99/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.9 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet 11K ratings, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker 16K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $40.6K for Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet and $93.8K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.