Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans vs Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans
Fitia Technologies
Google Play
$674.7K/mo
~$8.10M/yr · 13.5M installs
VS
Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker
Y7 Technology
Google Play
$166/mo
~$2.0K/yr · 1K installs
Revenue winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans wins
+406344% vs other
Installs winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans wins
+1273939% vs other
MAU winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans wins
+407593% vs other
Rating winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans wins
+483% vs other
Why Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans earns roughly 4064× more per month than Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker - $674.7K vs $166.
- Premium pricing. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans charges $9.44/mo vs Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker's $2.08/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans has ~13.5M lifetime installs vs Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker's ~1K - 12740.4× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans sits at 4.83★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans
vs
Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$674.7K
◀
$166
Annual revenue (est.)
$8.10M
◀
$2.0K
Lifetime installs (est.)
13.5M
◀
1K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.2M
◀
292.05
App Store rating
4.83★
◀
-
Total ratings
350K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.44
◀
$2.08
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 17, 2019
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 24.0.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 23, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 19, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.1.0
- Languages
- -
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans trajectory
Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans or Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans earns about $674.7K per month, while Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker earns about $166. That is a 4064.4× revenue gap (~$674.5K more per month for Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans). Annual revenue: Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans ≈ $8.10M/year, Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker ≈ $2.0K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans or Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans leads with about 13.5M estimated downloads vs 1K for Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker - a 12740.4× gap. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans and Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans and Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker offer? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans: IAP range $0.99 - $89.99 per item. Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker: IAP range $25.99 per item. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans runs a "Subscription (~$9.44/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker runs "Subscription (~$2.08/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans or Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.8 stars). Rating volume: Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans 762 ratings, Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans vs Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $674.7K for Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans and $166 for Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans or Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.