Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet
Fitia Technologies
Google Play
$698.4K/mo
~$8.38M/yr · 14.0M installs
VS
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Stronger By Science Technologies LLC
Google Play
$102.0K/mo
~$1.22M/yr · 1.4M installs
Revenue winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet wins
+585% vs other
Installs winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet wins
+916% vs other
MAU winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet wins
+588% vs other
Rating winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet wins
+0% vs other
Why Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet earns roughly 7× more per month than MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - $698.4K vs $102.0K.
- Aggressive pricing. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet undercuts at $9.44/mo vs $11.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet has ~14.0M lifetime installs vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker's ~1.4M - 10.2× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet
vs
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$698.4K
◀
$102.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$8.38M
◀
$1.22M
Lifetime installs (est.)
14.0M
◀
1.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.2M
◀
179K
App Store rating
4.85★
◀
4.84★
Total ratings
402K
◀
15K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.44
▶
$11.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 17, 2019
- Last updated
- Jun 27, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 24.1.13
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 14, 2021
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone 10+
- Version
- 5.7.9
- Languages
- -
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet trajectory
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet earns about $698.4K per month, while MacroFactor - Macro Tracker earns about $102.0K. That is a 6.8× revenue gap (~$596.3K more per month for Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet). Annual revenue: Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet ≈ $8.38M/year, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.22M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet leads with about 14.0M estimated downloads vs 1.4M for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - a 10.2× gap. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker offer? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet: IAP range $0.99 - $89.99 per item. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $89.99 per item. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet runs a "Subscription (~$9.44/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; MacroFactor - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet 950 ratings, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $698.4K for Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet and $102.0K for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitia: Calorie Counter & Diet or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.