Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker vs MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker
Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker
Y7 Technology
Google Play
$166/mo
~$2.0K/yr · 1K installs
VS
MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker
Adventure Labs d.o.o.
Google Play
$1.2K/mo
~$14.9K/yr · 8K installs
Revenue winner
MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+649% vs other
Installs winner
MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+608% vs other
MAU winner
MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+649% vs other
Rating winner
MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+476% vs other
Why MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker earns roughly 7× more per month than Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker - $1.2K vs $166.
- Premium pricing. MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker charges $7.03/mo vs Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker's $2.08/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker has ~8K lifetime installs vs Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker's ~1K - 7.1× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker sits at 4.76★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker
vs
MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$166
▶
$1.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.0K
▶
$14.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
1K
▶
8K
Monthly active users (est.)?
292.05
▶
2K
App Store rating
-
▶
4.76★
Total ratings
0
▶
406
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.08
▶
$7.03
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 23, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 19, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.1.0
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 10, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 1, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.3.0
- Languages
- -
Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker trajectory
MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker or MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker? v
MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker earns about $1.2K per month, while Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker earns about $166. That is a 7.5× revenue gap (~$1.1K more per month for MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker ≈ $2.0K/year, MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $14.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker or MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker? v
MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker leads with about 8K estimated downloads vs 1K for Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker - a 7.1× gap. Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker reports 5,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker and MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker and MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker offer? v
Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker: IAP range $25.99 per item. MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range $0.99 - $49.99 per item. Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$2.08/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$7.03/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker or MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker? v
MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.8 stars). Rating volume: Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker 0 ratings, MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker 20 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker vs MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $166 for Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker and $1.2K for MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker or MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.