Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker vs PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理
Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker
Y7 Technology
Google Play
$163/mo
~$2.0K/yr · 1K installs
VS
PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理
ライフログテクノロジー株式会社
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 665K installs
Revenue winner
Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker wins
+16300% vs other
Installs winner
PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 wins
+63689% vs other
MAU winner
PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 wins
+42581% vs other
Rating winner
PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 wins
+400% vs other
Why Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker earns roughly 163× more per month than PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 - $163 vs $0.
- Subscription model. Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker runs a $2.08/mo subscription that compounds; PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker
vs
PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$163
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.0K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
1K
▶
665K
Monthly active users (est.)?
286.55
▶
122K
App Store rating
-
▶
4.00★
Total ratings
0
▶
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.08
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 23, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 19, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.1.0
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 14, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 16, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 2.5.13
- Languages
- -
Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker trajectory
PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker or PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理? v
Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker earns about $163 per month, while PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$163 more per month for Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker). Annual revenue: Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker ≈ $2.0K/year, PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker or PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理? v
PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 leads with about 665K estimated downloads vs 1K for Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker - a 637.9× gap. Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker and PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker and PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 offer? v
Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker: IAP range $25.99 per item. PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理: no IAP detected on the public listing. Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$2.08/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker or PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理? v
PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.0 stars). Rating volume: Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker 0 ratings, PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 4 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker vs PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $163 for Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker and $0 for PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker or PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.