FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home vs HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home
EXTRAMILE LIMITED
App Store
$1.01M/mo
~$12.06M/yr · 8.0M installs
VS
HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor
Tantsissa
App Store
$358.7K/mo
~$4.30M/yr · 1.5M installs
Revenue winner
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home wins
+180% vs other
Installs winner
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home wins
+434% vs other
MAU winner
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home wins
+437% vs other
Rating winner
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home wins
+2% vs other
Why FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home earns roughly 3× more per month than HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor - $1.01M vs $358.7K.
- Subscription model. FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home runs a $14.99/mo subscription that compounds; HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home has ~8.0M lifetime installs vs HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor's ~1.5M - 5.3× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home runs 7 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home
vs
HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.01M
◀
$358.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$12.06M
◀
$4.30M
Lifetime installs (est.)
8.0M
◀
1.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
2.1M
◀
386K
App Store rating
4.79★
◀
4.68★
Total ratings
73K
◀
14K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$14.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 28, 2023
- Last updated
- Jul 1, 2026
- File size
- 194.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.37.1
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Polish, Portuguese +1 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD8.99
- Released
- Dec 7, 2015
- Last updated
- Oct 21, 2025
- File size
- 73.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.9
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +7 more
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home trajectory
HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home or HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor? v
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home earns about $1.01M per month, while HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor earns about $358.7K. That is a 2.8× revenue gap (~$646.4K more per month for FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home). Annual revenue: FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home ≈ $12.06M/year, HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor ≈ $4.30M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home or HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor? v
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home leads with about 8.0M estimated downloads vs 1.5M for HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor - a 5.3× gap. FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home's App Store downloads are estimated from 73K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor's App Store downloads are estimated from 14K ratings.
Are FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home and HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home and HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor offer? v
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home: IAP range 7 tiers detected. HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor: no IAP detected on the public listing. FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home runs a "Subscription (~$14.99/mo)" monetization model; HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor runs "Paid app ($8.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home or HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor? v
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home 73K ratings, HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor 14K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home vs HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.01M for FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home and $358.7K for HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home or HeartWatch: Heart Rate Monitor to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.