FitPix - Face & Body Editor vs Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video
FitPix - Face & Body Editor
eToolkit Inc
Google Play
$827.3K/mo
~$9.93M/yr · 22.5M installs
VS
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video
PicsArt, Inc.
Google Play
$23.70M/mo
~$284.37M/yr · 1.4B installs
Revenue winner
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video wins
+2765% vs other
Installs winner
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video wins
+6204% vs other
MAU winner
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video wins
+2340% vs other
Rating winner
FitPix - Face & Body Editor wins
+12% vs other
Why Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video earns roughly 29× more per month than FitPix - Face & Body Editor - $23.70M vs $827.3K.
- Premium pricing. Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video charges $14.76/mo vs FitPix - Face & Body Editor's $8.69/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video has ~1.4B lifetime installs vs FitPix - Face & Body Editor's ~22.5M - 63.0× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$827.3K
▶
$23.70M
Annual revenue (est.)
$9.93M
▶
$284.37M
Lifetime installs (est.)
22.5M
▶
1.4B
Monthly active users (est.)?
2.1M
▶
51.0M
App Store rating
4.49★
◀
4.01★
Total ratings
51K
▶
12.2M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$8.69
▶
$14.76
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 22, 2021
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.8.27
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 4, 2011
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 30.2.6
- Languages
- -
FitPix - Face & Body Editor trajectory
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, FitPix - Face & Body Editor or Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video? v
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video earns about $23.70M per month, while FitPix - Face & Body Editor earns about $827.3K. That is a 28.6× revenue gap (~$22.87M more per month for Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video). Annual revenue: FitPix - Face & Body Editor ≈ $9.93M/year, Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video ≈ $284.37M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, FitPix - Face & Body Editor or Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video? v
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video leads with about 1.4B estimated downloads vs 22.5M for FitPix - Face & Body Editor - a 63.0× gap. FitPix - Face & Body Editor reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video reports 1,000,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are FitPix - Face & Body Editor and Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photography category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do FitPix - Face & Body Editor and Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video offer? v
FitPix - Face & Body Editor: IAP range $1.99 - $37.95 per item. Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video: IAP range $0.99 - $219.99 per item. FitPix - Face & Body Editor runs a "Subscription (~$8.69/mo)" monetization model; Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video runs "Subscription (~$14.76/mo, ai)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, FitPix - Face & Body Editor or Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video? v
FitPix - Face & Body Editor edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: FitPix - Face & Body Editor 808 ratings, Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video 442K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these FitPix - Face & Body Editor vs Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $827.3K for FitPix - Face & Body Editor and $23.70M for Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare FitPix - Face & Body Editor or Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
