flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms vs Marco Polo - Video Messenger
flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms
flatsforfriendz
App Store
$106/mo
~$1.3K/yr · 400 installs
VS
Marco Polo - Video Messenger
Joya Communications
App Store
$6.77M/mo
~$81.21M/yr · 365.2M installs
Revenue winner
Marco Polo - Video Messenger wins
+6384164% vs other
Installs winner
Marco Polo - Video Messenger wins
+91287520% vs other
MAU winner
Marco Polo - Video Messenger wins
+14413735% vs other
Rating winner
flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms wins
+5% vs other
Why Marco Polo - Video Messenger is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Marco Polo - Video Messenger earns roughly 63843× more per month than flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms - $6.77M vs $106.
- Aggressive pricing. Marco Polo - Video Messenger undercuts at $14.99/mo vs $17.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Marco Polo - Video Messenger has ~365.2M lifetime installs vs flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms's ~400 - 912876.2× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Marco Polo - Video Messenger report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms
vs
Marco Polo - Video Messenger
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$106
▶
$6.77M
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.3K
▶
$81.21M
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
365.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
182.4
▶
26.3M
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
4.76★
Total ratings
4
▶
2.1M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$17.99
◀
$14.99
IAP tiers detected
6 tiers
◀
5 tiers
- Category
- Social Networking
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 11, 2025
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 105.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.60.1
- Languages
- English, German
- Category
- Social Networking
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 7, 2014
- Last updated
- May 4, 2026
- File size
- 224.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 0.1573.0
- Languages
- English
flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms trajectory
Marco Polo - Video Messenger trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms or Marco Polo - Video Messenger? v
Marco Polo - Video Messenger earns about $6.77M per month, while flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms earns about $106. That is a 63842.6× revenue gap (~$6.77M more per month for Marco Polo - Video Messenger). Annual revenue: flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms ≈ $1.3K/year, Marco Polo - Video Messenger ≈ $81.21M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms or Marco Polo - Video Messenger? v
Marco Polo - Video Messenger leads with about 365.2M estimated downloads vs 400 for flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms - a 912876.2× gap. flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms's App Store downloads are estimated from 4 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Marco Polo - Video Messenger's App Store downloads are estimated from 2.1M ratings.
Are flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms and Marco Polo - Video Messenger in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Social Networking category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms and Marco Polo - Video Messenger offer? v
flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms: IAP range 6 tiers detected. Marco Polo - Video Messenger: IAP range 5 tiers detected. flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms runs a "Subscription (~$17.99/mo)" monetization model; Marco Polo - Video Messenger runs "Subscription (~$7.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms or Marco Polo - Video Messenger? v
flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms 4 ratings, Marco Polo - Video Messenger 2.1M ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms vs Marco Polo - Video Messenger revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $106 for flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms and $6.77M for Marco Polo - Video Messenger are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Social Networking) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare flatsforfriendz: flats & rooms or Marco Polo - Video Messenger to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.