Floating Sandbox vs Magic Research
Floating Sandbox
g2-labs
Google Play
$2.6K/mo
~$30.9K/yr · 48K installs
VS
Magic Research
Maticolotto
Google Play
$5.9K/mo
~$70.3K/yr · 122K installs
Revenue winner
Magic Research wins
+127% vs other
Installs winner
Magic Research wins
+156% vs other
MAU winner
Magic Research wins
+90% vs other
Rating winner
Floating Sandbox wins
+1% vs other
Why Magic Research is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Magic Research earns roughly 2× more per month than Floating Sandbox - $5.9K vs $2.6K.
- Bigger install base. Magic Research has ~122K lifetime installs vs Floating Sandbox's ~48K - 2.6× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Magic Research report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Floating Sandbox
vs
Magic Research
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.6K
▶
$5.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$30.9K
▶
$70.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
48K
▶
122K
Monthly active users (est.)?
10K
▶
18K
App Store rating
4.74★
◀
4.67★
Total ratings
1K
▶
2K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Simulation
- Price
- USD4.49
- Released
- Dec 17, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 23, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone 10+
- Version
- 1.1.0.34
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Simulation
- Price
- USD3.99
- Released
- Jan 25, 2023
- Last updated
- Oct 17, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.15.12
- Languages
- -
Floating Sandbox trajectory
Magic Research trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Floating Sandbox or Magic Research? v
Magic Research earns about $5.9K per month, while Floating Sandbox earns about $2.6K. That is a 2.3× revenue gap (~$3.3K more per month for Magic Research). Annual revenue: Floating Sandbox ≈ $30.9K/year, Magic Research ≈ $70.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Floating Sandbox or Magic Research? v
Magic Research leads with about 122K estimated downloads vs 48K for Floating Sandbox - a 2.6× gap. Floating Sandbox reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play. Magic Research reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Floating Sandbox and Magic Research in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Simulation category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Floating Sandbox and Magic Research have in-app purchases? v
Floating Sandbox does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Magic Research does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Floating Sandbox runs "Paid app ($4.49)", Magic Research runs "Paid app ($3.99)".
Which has better ratings, Floating Sandbox or Magic Research? v
Floating Sandbox edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Floating Sandbox 125 ratings, Magic Research 386 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Floating Sandbox vs Magic Research revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.6K for Floating Sandbox and $5.9K for Magic Research are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Simulation) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Floating Sandbox or Magic Research to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.