Flud+ vs VicoHome: Smart Home Camera

VicoHome: Smart Home Camera earns about $63.1K per month, while Flud+ earns about $8.8K. That is a 7.2× revenue gap (~$54.4K more per month for VicoHome: Smart Home Camera). Annual revenue: Flud+ ≈ $105.5K/year, VicoHome: Smart Home Camera ≈ $757.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

VicoHome: Smart Home Camera leads with about 2.3M estimated downloads vs 184K for Flud+ - a 12.4× gap. Flud+ reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play. VicoHome: Smart Home Camera reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Video Players & Editors category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Flud+: no IAP detected on the public listing. VicoHome: Smart Home Camera: IAP range $0.99 - $999.99 per item. Flud+ runs a "Paid app ($3.99)" monetization model; VicoHome: Smart Home Camera runs "Subscription (~$31.46/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.

Flud+ edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Flud+ 1K ratings, VicoHome: Smart Home Camera 5K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $8.8K for Flud+ and $63.1K for VicoHome: Smart Home Camera are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Video Players & Editors) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.