FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas vs LuckyDrama
FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas
FujiTV
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 400 installs
VS
LuckyDrama
Sugar_Studio
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 12.5M installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
LuckyDrama wins
+3132706% vs other
MAU winner
LuckyDrama wins
+1065308% vs other
Rating winner
LuckyDrama wins
+61% vs other
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas
vs
LuckyDrama
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
12.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
98.8
▶
1.1M
App Store rating
2.67★
▶
4.30★
Total ratings
3
▶
62K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Entertainment
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 3, 2026
- Last updated
- Jun 10, 2026
- File size
- 106.6 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 1.2.1
- Languages
- English, Japanese
- Category
- Entertainment
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 23, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.2.0
- Languages
- -
FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas trajectory
LuckyDrama trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas or LuckyDrama? v
LuckyDrama earns about $0 per month, while FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas ≈ $0/year, LuckyDrama ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas or LuckyDrama? v
LuckyDrama leads with about 12.5M estimated downloads vs 400 for FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas - a 31328.1× gap. FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas's App Store downloads are estimated from 3 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. LuckyDrama reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas and LuckyDrama in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Entertainment category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas and LuckyDrama have in-app purchases? v
FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. LuckyDrama does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", LuckyDrama runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas or LuckyDrama? v
LuckyDrama edges ahead with ★ 4.3 vs ★ 2.7 (gap of 1.6 stars). Rating volume: FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas 3 ratings, LuckyDrama 399 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas vs LuckyDrama revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas and $0 for LuckyDrama are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Entertainment) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare FOD SHORT: Bite-Sized Dramas or LuckyDrama to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.