Fog of World vs Yorkshire Three Peaks

Fog of World earns about $185.8K per month, while Yorkshire Three Peaks earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$185.8K more per month for Fog of World). Annual revenue: Fog of World ≈ $2.23M/year, Yorkshire Three Peaks ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Fog of World leads with about 232K estimated downloads vs 0 for Yorkshire Three Peaks - a ∞× gap. Fog of World's App Store downloads are estimated from 3K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Yorkshire Three Peaks's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings.

Yes - both apps sit in the Travel category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Fog of World does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Yorkshire Three Peaks does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Fog of World runs "Paid app ($30.00)", Yorkshire Three Peaks runs "Paid app ($2.99)".

Fog of World edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.8 stars). Rating volume: Fog of World 3K ratings, Yorkshire Three Peaks 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $185.8K for Fog of World and $0 for Yorkshire Three Peaks are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.