Folium vs Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto
Folium
Jarrod Norwell
App Store
$3.3K/mo
~$39.3K/yr · 41K installs
VS
Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto
Brightstar Lottery S.p.A.
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 3.4M installs
Revenue winner
Folium wins
+327300% vs other
Installs winner
Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto wins
+8226% vs other
MAU winner
Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto wins
+4614% vs other
Rating winner
Folium wins
+242% vs other
Why Folium is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Folium earns roughly 3273× more per month than Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto - $3.3K vs $0.
- Better app store reviews. Folium sits at 2.42★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.3K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$39.3K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
41K
▶
3.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
10K
▶
468K
App Store rating
2.42★
◀
-
Total ratings
821
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Entertainment
- Price
- USD2.99
- Released
- May 31, 2024
- Last updated
- Mar 18, 2026
- File size
- 66.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.38
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Entertainment
- Price
- Free
- Released
- -
- Last updated
- Apr 10, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Mature 17+
- Version
- 3.4
- Languages
- -
Folium trajectory
Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Folium or Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto? v
Folium earns about $3.3K per month, while Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$3.3K more per month for Folium). Annual revenue: Folium ≈ $39.3K/year, Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Folium or Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto? v
Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto leads with about 3.4M estimated downloads vs 41K for Folium - a 83.3× gap. Folium's App Store downloads are estimated from 820 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Folium and Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Entertainment category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Folium and Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto have in-app purchases? v
Folium does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Folium runs "Paid app ($2.99)", Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, Folium or Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto? v
Folium edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 2.4 stars). Rating volume: Folium 820 ratings, Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Folium vs Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.3K for Folium and $0 for Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Entertainment) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Folium or Verifica Gratta e Vinci Lotto to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
