FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log vs FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home
FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log
Aspyre Solutions
App Store
$259/mo
~$3.1K/yr · 2K installs
VS
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home
Extramile Limited
Google Play
$54.2K/mo
~$650.1K/yr · 501K installs
Revenue winner
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home wins
+20817% vs other
Installs winner
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home wins
+25612% vs other
MAU winner
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home wins
+31017% vs other
Rating winner
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home wins
+17% vs other
Why FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home earns roughly 209× more per month than FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log - $54.2K vs $259.
- Subscription model. FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home runs a $22.35/mo subscription that compounds; FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home has ~501K lifetime installs vs FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log's ~2K - 257.1× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home sits at 4.44★ vs 3.79★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log
vs
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$259
▶
$54.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.1K
▶
$650.1K
Lifetime installs (est.)
2K
▶
501K
Monthly active users (est.)?
306.15
▶
95K
App Store rating
3.79★
▶
4.44★
Total ratings
39
▶
22K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$22.35
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD4.99
- Released
- Apr 5, 2010
- Last updated
- Apr 11, 2017
- File size
- 9.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.4.2
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 28, 2023
- Last updated
- May 11, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.27
- Languages
- -
FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log trajectory
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log or FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home? v
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home earns about $54.2K per month, while FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log earns about $259. That is a 209.2× revenue gap (~$53.9K more per month for FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home). Annual revenue: FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log ≈ $3.1K/year, FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home ≈ $650.1K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log or FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home? v
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home leads with about 501K estimated downloads vs 2K for FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log - a 257.1× gap. FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log's App Store downloads are estimated from 39 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log and FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log and FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home offer? v
FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log: no IAP detected on the public listing. FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home: IAP range $9.99 - $49.99 per item. FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log runs a "Paid app ($4.99)" monetization model; FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home runs "Subscription (~$22.35/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log or FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home? v
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home edges ahead with ★ 4.4 vs ★ 3.8 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log 39 ratings, FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log vs FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $259 for FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log and $54.2K for FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare FoodTrackerPro - Daily Food Eating Log or FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.