Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter vs Intensive 21
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
Foodvisor
Google Play
$496.1K/mo
~$5.95M/yr · 10.2M installs
VS
Intensive 21
Intensive 21 SRL
Google Play
$577/mo
~$6.9K/yr · 16K installs
Revenue winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+85881% vs other
Installs winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+62423% vs other
MAU winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+19550% vs other
Rating winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+461% vs other
Why Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 860× more per month than Intensive 21 - $496.1K vs $577.
- Subscription model. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter runs a $27.91/mo subscription that compounds; Intensive 21 relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter has ~10.2M lifetime installs vs Intensive 21's ~16K - 625.2× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter sits at 4.61★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
vs
Intensive 21
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$496.1K
◀
$577
Annual revenue (est.)
$5.95M
◀
$6.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
10.2M
◀
16K
Monthly active users (est.)?
788K
◀
4K
App Store rating
4.61★
◀
-
Total ratings
151K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$27.91
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 8, 2018
- Last updated
- Mar 31, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 7.0.0-3
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 24, 2023
- Last updated
- Sep 15, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 3.3.6
- Languages
- -
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter trajectory
Intensive 21 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or Intensive 21? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns about $496.1K per month, while Intensive 21 earns about $577. That is a 859.8× revenue gap (~$495.5K more per month for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter ≈ $5.95M/year, Intensive 21 ≈ $6.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or Intensive 21? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter leads with about 10.2M estimated downloads vs 16K for Intensive 21 - a 625.2× gap. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Intensive 21 reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and Intensive 21 in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and Intensive 21 offer? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $6.49 - $119.99 per item. Intensive 21: IAP range $42.99 - $259.99 per item. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$27.91/mo)" monetization model; Intensive 21 runs "Free + IAP (tiers not exposed by store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or Intensive 21? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.6 stars). Rating volume: Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter 3K ratings, Intensive 21 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter vs Intensive 21 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $496.1K for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and $577 for Intensive 21 are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or Intensive 21 to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.