Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
Foodvisor
Google Play
$499.4K/mo
~$5.99M/yr · 10.3M installs
VS
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Stronger By Science Technologies LLC
Google Play
$95.5K/mo
~$1.15M/yr · 1.3M installs
Revenue winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+423% vs other
Installs winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+689% vs other
MAU winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+374% vs other
Rating winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+1% vs other
Why Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 5× more per month than MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - $499.4K vs $95.5K.
- Premium pricing. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter charges $27.91/mo vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker's $11.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter has ~10.3M lifetime installs vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker's ~1.3M - 7.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
vs
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$499.4K
◀
$95.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$5.99M
◀
$1.15M
Lifetime installs (est.)
10.3M
◀
1.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
793K
◀
167K
App Store rating
4.62★
▶
4.65★
Total ratings
154K
◀
13K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$27.91
◀
$11.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 8, 2018
- Last updated
- Mar 31, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 7.0.0-3
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 14, 2021
- Last updated
- May 11, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone 10+
- Version
- 5.7.6
- Languages
- -
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter trajectory
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns about $499.4K per month, while MacroFactor - Macro Tracker earns about $95.5K. That is a 5.2× revenue gap (~$404.0K more per month for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter ≈ $5.99M/year, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.15M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter leads with about 10.3M estimated downloads vs 1.3M for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - a 7.9× gap. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker offer? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $6.49 - $119.99 per item. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $89.99 per item. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$27.91/mo)" monetization model; MacroFactor - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter 3K ratings, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $499.4K for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and $95.5K for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.