Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
Foodvisor
Google Play
$496.1K/mo
~$5.95M/yr · 10.2M installs
VS
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
MacrosFirst, Inc.
Google Play
$47.9K/mo
~$575.1K/yr · 310K installs
Revenue winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+935% vs other
Installs winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+3201% vs other
MAU winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+1071% vs other
Rating winner
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins
+2% vs other
Why Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 10× more per month than MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker - $496.1K vs $47.9K.
- Premium pricing. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter charges $27.91/mo vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's $23.65/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter has ~10.2M lifetime installs vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's ~310K - 33.0× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
vs
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$496.1K
◀
$47.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$5.95M
◀
$575.1K
Lifetime installs (est.)
10.2M
◀
310K
Monthly active users (est.)?
788K
◀
67K
App Store rating
4.61★
▶
4.72★
Total ratings
151K
◀
4K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$27.91
◀
$23.65
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 8, 2018
- Last updated
- Mar 31, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 7.0.0-3
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 14, 2017
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.1.590
- Languages
- -
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter trajectory
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns about $496.1K per month, while MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker earns about $47.9K. That is a 10.4× revenue gap (~$448.2K more per month for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter ≈ $5.95M/year, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker ≈ $575.1K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter leads with about 10.2M estimated downloads vs 310K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker - a 33.0× gap. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker offer? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $6.49 - $119.99 per item. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker: IAP range $6.99 - $79.99 per item. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$27.91/mo)" monetization model; MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$23.65/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter 3K ratings, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker 493 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $496.1K for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and $47.9K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.