Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter vs Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
Foodvisor
App Store
$220.7K/mo
~$2.65M/yr · 1.8M installs
VS
Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO
The Happiest Baby, Inc.
App Store
$27.3K/mo
~$328.0K/yr · 414K installs
Revenue winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+707% vs other
Installs winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+331% vs other
MAU winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+350% vs other
Rating winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+14% vs other
Why Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 8× more per month than Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO - $220.7K vs $27.3K.
- Aggressive pricing. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter undercuts at $14.99/mo vs $19.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter has ~1.8M lifetime installs vs Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO's ~414K - 4.3× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter runs 8 IAP tiers vs 3 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
vs
Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$220.7K
◀
$27.3K
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.65M
◀
$328.0K
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.8M
◀
414K
Monthly active users (est.)?
456K
◀
101K
App Store rating
4.58★
◀
4.02★
Total ratings
16K
◀
5K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$14.99
▶
$19.99
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
3 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 12, 2016
- Last updated
- Jul 1, 2026
- File size
- 264.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 9.19.0
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +14 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 10, 2022
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- 83.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.0.1
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Spanish +1 more
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter trajectory
Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns about $220.7K per month, while Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO earns about $27.3K. That is a 8.1× revenue gap (~$193.3K more per month for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter ≈ $2.65M/year, Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO ≈ $328.0K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter leads with about 1.8M estimated downloads vs 414K for Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO - a 4.3× gap. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO's App Store downloads are estimated from 5K ratings.
Are Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO offer? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$14.99/mo)" monetization model; Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO runs "Subscription (~$8.33/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter 16K ratings, Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO 5K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter vs Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $220.7K for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and $27.3K for Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.