Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter vs Health Sense: Track & Record
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
Foodvisor
App Store
$220.6K/mo
~$2.65M/yr · 1.8M installs
VS
Health Sense: Track & Record
Health Applines
Google Play
$700.2K/mo
~$8.40M/yr · 17.3M installs
Revenue winner
Health Sense: Track & Record wins
+217% vs other
Installs winner
Health Sense: Track & Record wins
+869% vs other
MAU winner
Health Sense: Track & Record wins
+169% vs other
Rating winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+27% vs other
Why Health Sense: Track & Record is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Health Sense: Track & Record earns roughly 3× more per month than Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter - $700.2K vs $220.6K.
- Aggressive pricing. Health Sense: Track & Record undercuts at $10.93/mo vs $14.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Health Sense: Track & Record has ~17.3M lifetime installs vs Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter's ~1.8M - 9.7× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Health Sense: Track & Record report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
vs
Health Sense: Track & Record
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$220.6K
▶
$700.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.65M
▶
$8.40M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.8M
▶
17.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
456K
▶
1.2M
App Store rating
4.58★
◀
3.60★
Total ratings
16K
◀
9K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$14.99
◀
$10.93
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 12, 2016
- Last updated
- Jul 1, 2026
- File size
- 264.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 9.19.0
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +14 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 16, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 10, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.25.0
- Languages
- -
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter trajectory
Health Sense: Track & Record trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or Health Sense: Track & Record? v
Health Sense: Track & Record earns about $700.2K per month, while Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns about $220.6K. That is a 3.2× revenue gap (~$479.7K more per month for Health Sense: Track & Record). Annual revenue: Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter ≈ $2.65M/year, Health Sense: Track & Record ≈ $8.40M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or Health Sense: Track & Record? v
Health Sense: Track & Record leads with about 17.3M estimated downloads vs 1.8M for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter - a 9.7× gap. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Health Sense: Track & Record reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and Health Sense: Track & Record in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and Health Sense: Track & Record offer? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Health Sense: Track & Record: IAP range $2.99 - $39.99 per item. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$14.99/mo)" monetization model; Health Sense: Track & Record runs "Subscription (~$10.93/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or Health Sense: Track & Record? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 1.0 stars). Rating volume: Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter 16K ratings, Health Sense: Track & Record 880 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter vs Health Sense: Track & Record revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $220.6K for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and $700.2K for Health Sense: Track & Record are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or Health Sense: Track & Record to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.