Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
Foodvisor
App Store
$212.2K/mo
~$2.55M/yr · 1.7M installs
VS
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
MacrosFirst, Inc.
App Store
$93.8K/mo
~$1.13M/yr · 551K installs
Revenue winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+126% vs other
Installs winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+211% vs other
MAU winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+172% vs other
Rating winner
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins
+6% vs other
Why Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 2× more per month than MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker - $212.2K vs $93.8K.
- Premium pricing. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter charges $14.99/mo vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's $11.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter has ~1.7M lifetime installs vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's ~551K - 3.1× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter runs 8 IAP tiers vs 1 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
vs
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$212.2K
◀
$93.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.55M
◀
$1.13M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.7M
◀
551K
Monthly active users (est.)?
439K
◀
161K
App Store rating
4.58★
▶
4.86★
Total ratings
16K
▶
16K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$14.99
◀
$11.99
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 12, 2016
- Last updated
- Apr 22, 2026
- File size
- 223.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 9.15.2
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +14 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 174.2 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.1.590
- Languages
- English
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter trajectory
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns about $212.2K per month, while MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker earns about $93.8K. That is a 2.3× revenue gap (~$118.4K more per month for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter ≈ $2.55M/year, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.13M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter leads with about 1.7M estimated downloads vs 551K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker - a 3.1× gap. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings.
Are Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker offer? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter: IAP range 8 tiers detected. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$14.99/mo)" monetization model; MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.99/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter 16K ratings, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker 16K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $212.2K for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and $93.8K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.