Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter vs WatchPAT
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
Foodvisor
App Store
$211.2K/mo
~$2.53M/yr · 1.7M installs
VS
WatchPAT
Itamar Medical
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 820K installs
Revenue winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+21119400% vs other
Installs winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+108% vs other
MAU winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+199% vs other
Rating winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+29% vs other
Why Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 211194× more per month than WatchPAT - $211.2K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter runs a $14.99/mo subscription that compounds; WatchPAT relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter has ~1.7M lifetime installs vs WatchPAT's ~820K - 2.1× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter runs 8 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
vs
WatchPAT
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$211.2K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.53M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.7M
◀
820K
Monthly active users (est.)?
437K
◀
146K
App Store rating
4.58★
◀
3.55★
Total ratings
16K
◀
924
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$14.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 12, 2016
- Last updated
- Apr 22, 2026
- File size
- 223.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 9.15.2
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +14 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 29, 2019
- Last updated
- Oct 26, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.2.0
- Languages
- -
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter trajectory
WatchPAT trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or WatchPAT? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns about $211.2K per month, while WatchPAT earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$211.2K more per month for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter ≈ $2.53M/year, WatchPAT ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or WatchPAT? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter leads with about 1.7M estimated downloads vs 820K for WatchPAT - a 2.1× gap. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. WatchPAT reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and WatchPAT in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and WatchPAT offer? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter: IAP range 8 tiers detected. WatchPAT: no IAP detected on the public listing. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$14.99/mo)" monetization model; WatchPAT runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or WatchPAT? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 1.0 stars). Rating volume: Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter 16K ratings, WatchPAT 457 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter vs WatchPAT revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $211.2K for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter and $0 for WatchPAT are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter or WatchPAT to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.