Forest Weather vs PhotoPills
Forest Weather
MPP Apps
Google Play
$12/mo
~$138/yr · 267 installs
VS
PhotoPills
PhotoPills, SL
Google Play
$56.2K/mo
~$674.2K/yr · 426K installs
Revenue winner
PhotoPills wins
+468100% vs other
Installs winner
PhotoPills wins
+159460% vs other
MAU winner
PhotoPills wins
+126484% vs other
Rating winner
PhotoPills wins
+476% vs other
Why PhotoPills is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- PhotoPills earns roughly 4682× more per month than Forest Weather - $56.2K vs $12.
- Bigger install base. PhotoPills has ~426K lifetime installs vs Forest Weather's ~267 - 1595.6× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. PhotoPills sits at 4.76★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full PhotoPills report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Forest Weather
vs
PhotoPills
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$12
▶
$56.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$138
▶
$674.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
267
▶
426K
Monthly active users (est.)?
80.1
▶
101K
App Store rating
-
▶
4.76★
Total ratings
0
▶
8K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 19, 2026
- Last updated
- May 9, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 5.03.33 (2026-05-09)
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- USD10.99
- Released
- May 26, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 15, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.8.21
- Languages
- -
Forest Weather trajectory
PhotoPills trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Forest Weather or PhotoPills? v
PhotoPills earns about $56.2K per month, while Forest Weather earns about $12. That is a 4682.0× revenue gap (~$56.2K more per month for PhotoPills). Annual revenue: Forest Weather ≈ $138/year, PhotoPills ≈ $674.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Forest Weather or PhotoPills? v
PhotoPills leads with about 426K estimated downloads vs 267 for Forest Weather - a 1595.6× gap. Forest Weather reports 100+ installs on Google Play. PhotoPills reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Forest Weather and PhotoPills in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photography category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Forest Weather and PhotoPills offer? v
Forest Weather: IAP range $1.49 per item. PhotoPills: no IAP detected on the public listing. Forest Weather runs a "Free + IAP (tiers not exposed by store)" monetization model; PhotoPills runs "Paid app ($10.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Forest Weather or PhotoPills? v
PhotoPills edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.8 stars). Rating volume: Forest Weather 0 ratings, PhotoPills 512 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Forest Weather vs PhotoPills revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $12 for Forest Weather and $56.2K for PhotoPills are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Forest Weather or PhotoPills to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.