Fork Ranger - sustainable food vs Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Fork Ranger - sustainable food
Fork Ranger
App Store
$57/mo
~$685/yr · 3K installs
VS
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Too Good To Go
App Store
$2.88M/mo
~$34.56M/yr · 75.6M installs
Revenue winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+5052102% vs other
Installs winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+2563380% vs other
MAU winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+1089379% vs other
Rating winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+1% vs other
Why Too Good To Go: End Food Waste is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns roughly 50522× more per month than Fork Ranger - sustainable food - $2.88M vs $57.
- Premium pricing. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste charges $10.00/mo vs Fork Ranger - sustainable food's $3.00/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste has ~75.6M lifetime installs vs Fork Ranger - sustainable food's ~3K - 25634.8× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fork Ranger - sustainable food
vs
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$57
▶
$2.88M
Annual revenue (est.)
$685
▶
$34.56M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3K
▶
75.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
354
▶
3.9M
App Store rating
4.90★
▶
4.93★
Total ratings
59
▶
504K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.00
▶
$10.00
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2021
- Last updated
- May 9, 2026
- File size
- 34.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 9.3.1
- Languages
- Dutch, English, German
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 8, 2015
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 141.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.5.0
- Languages
- EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
Fork Ranger - sustainable food trajectory
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns about $2.88M per month, while Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns about $57. That is a 50522.0× revenue gap (~$2.88M more per month for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste). Annual revenue: Fork Ranger - sustainable food ≈ $685/year, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste ≈ $34.56M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste leads with about 75.6M estimated downloads vs 3K for Fork Ranger - sustainable food - a 25634.8× gap. Fork Ranger - sustainable food's App Store downloads are estimated from 59 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste's App Store downloads are estimated from 504K ratings.
Are Fork Ranger - sustainable food and Too Good To Go: End Food Waste in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fork Ranger - sustainable food and Too Good To Go: End Food Waste offer? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste: no IAP detected on the public listing. Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs a "Subscription (~$5.00/mo)" monetization model; Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fork Ranger - sustainable food or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.9 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Fork Ranger - sustainable food 59 ratings, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste 504K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fork Ranger - sustainable food vs Too Good To Go: End Food Waste revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $57 for Fork Ranger - sustainable food and $2.88M for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fork Ranger - sustainable food or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.