FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer vs Unsharp
FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer
FUJIFILM Corporation
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 800 installs
VS
Unsharp
北北 宋
App Store
$11/mo
~$127/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner
Unsharp wins
+1100% vs other
Installs winner
FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer wins
+100% vs other
MAU winner
FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer wins
+70% vs other
Rating winner
Unsharp wins
+92% vs other
Why Unsharp is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Unsharp earns roughly 11× more per month than FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer - $11 vs $0.
- Better app store reviews. Unsharp sits at 4.20★ vs 2.19★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Unsharp report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$11
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$127
Lifetime installs (est.)
800
◀
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
207.2
◀
122
App Store rating
2.19★
▶
4.20★
Total ratings
16
◀
5
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 12, 2015
- Last updated
- Mar 4, 2026
- File size
- 9.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.3.13
- Languages
- English, Japanese
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Aug 9, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 15, 2026
- File size
- 11.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.3.2
- Languages
- English, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Chinese
FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer trajectory
Unsharp trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer or Unsharp? v
Unsharp earns about $11 per month, while FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$11 more per month for Unsharp). Annual revenue: FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer ≈ $0/year, Unsharp ≈ $127/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer or Unsharp? v
FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer leads with about 800 estimated downloads vs 400 for Unsharp - a 2.0× gap. FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer's App Store downloads are estimated from 16 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Unsharp's App Store downloads are estimated from 5 ratings.
Are FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer and Unsharp in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer and Unsharp have in-app purchases? v
FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Unsharp does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Unsharp runs "Paid app ($0.99)".
Which has better ratings, FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer or Unsharp? v
Unsharp edges ahead with ★ 4.2 vs ★ 2.2 (gap of 2.0 stars). Rating volume: FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer 16 ratings, Unsharp 5 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer vs Unsharp revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer and $11 for Unsharp are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer or Unsharp to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
