Galaxy Widgets: One UI vs NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
Galaxy Widgets: One UI
AppsLab Co.
Google Play
$97/mo
~$1.2K/yr · 16K installs
VS
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
NXV Watch Face
Google Play
$133/mo
~$1.6K/yr · 7K installs
Revenue winner
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face wins
+37% vs other
Installs winner
Galaxy Widgets: One UI wins
+136% vs other
MAU winner
Galaxy Widgets: One UI wins
+171% vs other
Rating winner
Galaxy Widgets: One UI wins
+68% vs other
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Galaxy Widgets: One UI
vs
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$97
▶
$133
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.2K
▶
$1.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
16K
◀
7K
Monthly active users (est.)?
2K
◀
698.4
App Store rating
4.32★
◀
2.58★
Total ratings
518
◀
54
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.76
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD0.49
- Released
- Jan 30, 2026
- Last updated
- Mar 20, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.59
- Released
- Dec 18, 2021
- Last updated
- Sep 20, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Galaxy Widgets: One UI trajectory
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Galaxy Widgets: One UI or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face earns about $133 per month, while Galaxy Widgets: One UI earns about $97. That is a 1.4× revenue gap (~$36 more per month for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face). Annual revenue: Galaxy Widgets: One UI ≈ $1.2K/year, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face ≈ $1.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Galaxy Widgets: One UI or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
Galaxy Widgets: One UI leads with about 16K estimated downloads vs 7K for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face - a 2.4× gap. Galaxy Widgets: One UI reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face reports 5,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Galaxy Widgets: One UI and NXV43 Elegant Watch Face in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Galaxy Widgets: One UI and NXV43 Elegant Watch Face offer? v
Galaxy Widgets: One UI: IAP range $1.49 - $9.49 per item. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face: no IAP detected on the public listing. Galaxy Widgets: One UI runs a "Paid app ($0.49)" monetization model; NXV43 Elegant Watch Face runs "Paid app ($1.59)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Galaxy Widgets: One UI or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
Galaxy Widgets: One UI edges ahead with ★ 4.3 vs ★ 2.6 (gap of 1.7 stars). Rating volume: Galaxy Widgets: One UI 30 ratings, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face 21 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Galaxy Widgets: One UI vs NXV43 Elegant Watch Face revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $97 for Galaxy Widgets: One UI and $133 for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Galaxy Widgets: One UI or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.