Gambonanza vs Scopa - Classic Card Game
Gambonanza
Stray Fawn Studio
App Store
$53.1K/mo
~$636.9K/yr · 332K installs
VS
Scopa - Classic Card Game
Droid-Veda LLP
App Store
$2/mo
~$19/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner
Gambonanza wins
+2653450% vs other
Installs winner
Gambonanza wins
+82962% vs other
MAU winner
Gambonanza wins
+82148% vs other
Rating winner
Scopa - Classic Card Game wins
+2% vs other
Why Gambonanza is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Gambonanza earns roughly 26536× more per month than Scopa - Classic Card Game - $53.1K vs $2.
- Bigger install base. Gambonanza has ~332K lifetime installs vs Scopa - Classic Card Game's ~400 - 830.6× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Gambonanza report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Gambonanza
vs
Scopa - Classic Card Game
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$53.1K
◀
$2
Annual revenue (est.)
$636.9K
◀
$19
Lifetime installs (est.)
332K
◀
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
67K
◀
81.6
App Store rating
4.89★
▶
5.00★
Total ratings
2K
◀
1
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Games
- Price
- USD5.99
- Released
- May 1, 2026
- Last updated
- Jun 12, 2026
- File size
- 172.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.2.0
- Languages
- English, French, German, Japanese, Korean, Polish +5 more
- Category
- Games
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2026
- Last updated
- Apr 6, 2026
- File size
- 169.2 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 1.1
- Languages
- English
Gambonanza trajectory
Scopa - Classic Card Game trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Gambonanza or Scopa - Classic Card Game? v
Gambonanza earns about $53.1K per month, while Scopa - Classic Card Game earns about $2. That is a 26535.5× revenue gap (~$53.1K more per month for Gambonanza). Annual revenue: Gambonanza ≈ $636.9K/year, Scopa - Classic Card Game ≈ $19/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Gambonanza or Scopa - Classic Card Game? v
Gambonanza leads with about 332K estimated downloads vs 400 for Scopa - Classic Card Game - a 830.6× gap. Gambonanza's App Store downloads are estimated from 2K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Scopa - Classic Card Game's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings.
Are Gambonanza and Scopa - Classic Card Game in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Games category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Gambonanza and Scopa - Classic Card Game have in-app purchases? v
Gambonanza does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Scopa - Classic Card Game does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Gambonanza runs "Paid app ($5.99)", Scopa - Classic Card Game runs "Free casual game · ad-supported (~$0.04/MAU)".
Which has better ratings, Gambonanza or Scopa - Classic Card Game? v
Scopa - Classic Card Game edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.9 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Gambonanza 2K ratings, Scopa - Classic Card Game 1 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Gambonanza vs Scopa - Classic Card Game revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $53.1K for Gambonanza and $2 for Scopa - Classic Card Game are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Games) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Gambonanza or Scopa - Classic Card Game to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.