GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam vs PhotoPills
GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam
Noahproject Inc.
App Store
$21/mo
~$255/yr · 400 installs
VS
PhotoPills
PhotoPills S.L.
App Store
$35.0K/mo
~$420.3K/yr · 120K installs
Revenue winner
PhotoPills wins
+166695% vs other
Installs winner
PhotoPills wins
+29780% vs other
MAU winner
PhotoPills wins
+29132% vs other
Rating winner
GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam wins
+6% vs other
Why PhotoPills is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- PhotoPills earns roughly 1668× more per month than GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam - $35.0K vs $21.
- Bigger install base. PhotoPills has ~120K lifetime installs vs GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam's ~400 - 298.8× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full PhotoPills report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam
vs
PhotoPills
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$21
▶
$35.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$255
▶
$420.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
120K
Monthly active users (est.)?
129.2
▶
38K
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
4.70★
Total ratings
1
▶
1K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- USD1.99
- Released
- Dec 1, 2025
- Last updated
- May 3, 2026
- File size
- 79.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.3.1
- Languages
- English, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Chinese
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- USD10.99
- Released
- Mar 21, 2013
- Last updated
- Apr 16, 2026
- File size
- 51.0 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 2.13.25
- Languages
- Catalan, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +3 more
GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam trajectory
PhotoPills trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam or PhotoPills? v
PhotoPills earns about $35.0K per month, while GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam earns about $21. That is a 1668.0× revenue gap (~$35.0K more per month for PhotoPills). Annual revenue: GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam ≈ $255/year, PhotoPills ≈ $420.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam or PhotoPills? v
PhotoPills leads with about 120K estimated downloads vs 400 for GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam - a 298.8× gap. GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PhotoPills's App Store downloads are estimated from 1K ratings.
Are GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam and PhotoPills in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam and PhotoPills have in-app purchases? v
GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. PhotoPills does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam runs "Paid app ($1.99)", PhotoPills runs "Paid app ($10.99)".
Which has better ratings, GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam or PhotoPills? v
GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam 1 ratings, PhotoPills 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam vs PhotoPills revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $21 for GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam and $35.0K for PhotoPills are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam or PhotoPills to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.