Google Fit: Activity Tracker vs Fig: Food Scanner & Guide
Google Fit: Activity Tracker
Google
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 171K installs
VS
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide
Fig - Food Is Good
Google Play
$85.7K/mo
~$1.03M/yr · 790K installs
Revenue winner
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide wins
+8565300% vs other
Installs winner
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide wins
+362% vs other
MAU winner
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide wins
+251% vs other
Rating winner
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide wins
+5% vs other
Why Fig: Food Scanner & Guide is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fig: Food Scanner & Guide earns roughly 85653× more per month than Google Fit: Activity Tracker - $85.7K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide runs a $19.57/mo subscription that compounds; Google Fit: Activity Tracker relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide has ~790K lifetime installs vs Google Fit: Activity Tracker's ~171K - 4.6× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fig: Food Scanner & Guide report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Google Fit: Activity Tracker
vs
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$85.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$1.03M
Lifetime installs (est.)
171K
▶
790K
Monthly active users (est.)?
43K
▶
150K
App Store rating
4.26★
▶
4.49★
Total ratings
2K
▶
7K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$19.57
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 25, 2019
- Last updated
- Apr 2, 2026
- File size
- 288.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.102
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Catalan, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch +28 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 30, 2021
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.148.2
- Languages
- -
Google Fit: Activity Tracker trajectory
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Google Fit: Activity Tracker or Fig: Food Scanner & Guide? v
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide earns about $85.7K per month, while Google Fit: Activity Tracker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$85.7K more per month for Fig: Food Scanner & Guide). Annual revenue: Google Fit: Activity Tracker ≈ $0/year, Fig: Food Scanner & Guide ≈ $1.03M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google Fit: Activity Tracker or Fig: Food Scanner & Guide? v
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide leads with about 790K estimated downloads vs 171K for Google Fit: Activity Tracker - a 4.6× gap. Google Fit: Activity Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 2K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Google Fit: Activity Tracker and Fig: Food Scanner & Guide in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google Fit: Activity Tracker and Fig: Food Scanner & Guide offer? v
Google Fit: Activity Tracker: no IAP detected on the public listing. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide: IAP range $4.79 - $79.99 per item. Google Fit: Activity Tracker runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Fig: Food Scanner & Guide runs "Subscription (~$19.57/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google Fit: Activity Tracker or Fig: Food Scanner & Guide? v
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.3 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Google Fit: Activity Tracker 2K ratings, Fig: Food Scanner & Guide 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google Fit: Activity Tracker vs Fig: Food Scanner & Guide revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Google Fit: Activity Tracker and $85.7K for Fig: Food Scanner & Guide are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google Fit: Activity Tracker or Fig: Food Scanner & Guide to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.