Google Fit: Activity Tracker vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Google Fit: Activity Tracker
Google
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 173K installs
VS
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
MacrosFirst, Inc.
App Store
$109.7K/mo
~$1.32M/yr · 645K installs
Revenue winner
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins
+10973100% vs other
Installs winner
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins
+272% vs other
MAU winner
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins
+338% vs other
Rating winner
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins
+15% vs other
Why MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker earns roughly 109731× more per month than Google Fit: Activity Tracker - $109.7K vs $0.
- Subscription model. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker runs a $11.99/mo subscription that compounds; Google Fit: Activity Tracker relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker has ~645K lifetime installs vs Google Fit: Activity Tracker's ~173K - 3.7× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker sits at 4.86★ vs 4.24★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Google Fit: Activity Tracker
vs
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$109.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$1.32M
Lifetime installs (est.)
173K
▶
645K
Monthly active users (est.)?
43K
▶
189K
App Store rating
4.24★
▶
4.86★
Total ratings
2K
▶
18K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$11.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
1 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 25, 2019
- Last updated
- Jun 19, 2026
- File size
- 299.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.104
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Catalan, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch +28 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- Jun 28, 2026
- File size
- 185.9 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.1.679
- Languages
- English
Google Fit: Activity Tracker trajectory
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Google Fit: Activity Tracker or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker earns about $109.7K per month, while Google Fit: Activity Tracker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$109.7K more per month for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker). Annual revenue: Google Fit: Activity Tracker ≈ $0/year, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.32M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google Fit: Activity Tracker or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker leads with about 645K estimated downloads vs 173K for Google Fit: Activity Tracker - a 3.7× gap. Google Fit: Activity Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 2K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 18K ratings.
Are Google Fit: Activity Tracker and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google Fit: Activity Tracker and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker offer? v
Google Fit: Activity Tracker: no IAP detected on the public listing. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Google Fit: Activity Tracker runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.99/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google Fit: Activity Tracker or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.2 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: Google Fit: Activity Tracker 2K ratings, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker 18K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google Fit: Activity Tracker vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Google Fit: Activity Tracker and $109.7K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google Fit: Activity Tracker or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.