Google Fit: Activity Tracker vs Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Google Fit: Activity Tracker
Google
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 173K installs
VS
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Yuca
App Store
$662.5K/mo
~$7.95M/yr · 10.5M installs
Revenue winner
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+66255000% vs other
Installs winner
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+5971% vs other
MAU winner
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+4654% vs other
Rating winner
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+14% vs other
Why Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner earns roughly 662550× more per month than Google Fit: Activity Tracker - $662.5K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner runs a $10.00/mo subscription that compounds; Google Fit: Activity Tracker relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner has ~10.5M lifetime installs vs Google Fit: Activity Tracker's ~173K - 60.7× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner sits at 4.82★ vs 4.24★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Google Fit: Activity Tracker
vs
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$662.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$7.95M
Lifetime installs (est.)
173K
▶
10.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
43K
▶
2.1M
App Store rating
4.24★
▶
4.82★
Total ratings
2K
▶
96K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$10.00
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
1 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 25, 2019
- Last updated
- Jun 19, 2026
- File size
- 299.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.104
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Catalan, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch +28 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 9, 2017
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- 204.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.1
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish
Google Fit: Activity Tracker trajectory
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Google Fit: Activity Tracker or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner earns about $662.5K per month, while Google Fit: Activity Tracker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$662.5K more per month for Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner). Annual revenue: Google Fit: Activity Tracker ≈ $0/year, Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner ≈ $7.95M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google Fit: Activity Tracker or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner leads with about 10.5M estimated downloads vs 173K for Google Fit: Activity Tracker - a 60.7× gap. Google Fit: Activity Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 2K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner's App Store downloads are estimated from 96K ratings.
Are Google Fit: Activity Tracker and Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google Fit: Activity Tracker and Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner offer? v
Google Fit: Activity Tracker: no IAP detected on the public listing. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Google Fit: Activity Tracker runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner runs "Subscription (~$10.00/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google Fit: Activity Tracker or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.2 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: Google Fit: Activity Tracker 2K ratings, Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner 96K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google Fit: Activity Tracker vs Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Google Fit: Activity Tracker and $662.5K for Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google Fit: Activity Tracker or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.