Google vs No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube
Google
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 809.1M installs
VS
No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube
Guillaume Claverie
App Store
$48/mo
~$574/yr · 600 installs
Revenue winner
No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube wins
+4800% vs other
Installs winner
Google wins
+134846025% vs other
MAU winner
Google wins
+10553075% vs other
Rating winner
Google wins
+7% vs other
Why No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube earns roughly 48× more per month than Google - $48 vs $0.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Google
vs
No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$48
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$574
Lifetime installs (est.)
809.1M
◀
600
Monthly active users (est.)?
7.3M
◀
69
App Store rating
4.65★
◀
4.33★
Total ratings
4.8M
◀
12
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 12, 2019
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- 413.1 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 426.8
- Languages
- Arabic, BN, Bulgarian, Catalan, Croatian, Czech +36 more
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- USD2.99
- Released
- May 22, 2024
- Last updated
- Apr 22, 2026
- File size
- 0.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.2.1
- Languages
- English
Google trajectory
No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Google or No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube? v
No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube earns about $48 per month, while Google earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$48 more per month for No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube). Annual revenue: Google ≈ $0/year, No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube ≈ $574/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google or No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube? v
Google leads with about 809.1M estimated downloads vs 600 for No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube - a 1348461.3× gap. Google's App Store downloads are estimated from 4.8M ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube's App Store downloads are estimated from 12 ratings.
Are Google and No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Utilities category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Google and No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube have in-app purchases? v
Google does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Google runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube runs "Paid app ($2.99)".
Which has better ratings, Google or No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube? v
Google edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.3 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Google 4.8M ratings, No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube 12 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google vs No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Google and $48 for No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Utilities) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google or No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.