Google vs QR Code Reader ·
Google
App Store
$58.61M/mo
~$703.30M/yr · 770.5M installs
VS
QR Code Reader ·
App Lock LLC
App Store
$2.68M/mo
~$32.13M/yr · 100.2M installs
Revenue winner
Google wins
+2089% vs other
Installs winner
Google wins
+669% vs other
MAU winner
Google wins
+669% vs other
Rating winner
QR Code Reader · wins
+1% vs other
Why Google is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google earns roughly 22× more per month than QR Code Reader · - $58.61M vs $2.68M.
- Premium pricing. Google charges $19.99/mo vs QR Code Reader ·'s $3.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Google has ~770.5M lifetime installs vs QR Code Reader ·'s ~100.2M - 7.7× the funnel top.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Google
vs
QR Code Reader ·
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$58.61M
◀
$2.68M
Annual revenue (est.)
$703.30M
◀
$32.13M
Lifetime installs (est.)
770.5M
◀
100.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
90.9M
◀
11.8M
App Store rating
4.65★
▶
4.71★
Total ratings
4.5M
◀
668K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
$3.99
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
=
7 tiers
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 12, 2019
- Last updated
- May 4, 2026
- File size
- 392.0 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 419.4
- Languages
- Arabic, BN, Bulgarian, Catalan, Croatian, Czech +35 more
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 8, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 21, 2026
- File size
- 67.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.4.31
- Languages
- Arabic, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +16 more
Google trajectory
QR Code Reader · trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Google or QR Code Reader ·? v
Google earns about $58.61M per month, while QR Code Reader · earns about $2.68M. That is a 21.9× revenue gap (~$55.93M more per month for Google). Annual revenue: Google ≈ $703.30M/year, QR Code Reader · ≈ $32.13M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google or QR Code Reader ·? v
Google leads with about 770.5M estimated downloads vs 100.2M for QR Code Reader · - a 7.7× gap. Google's App Store downloads are estimated from 4.5M ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. QR Code Reader ·'s App Store downloads are estimated from 668K ratings.
Are Google and QR Code Reader · in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Utilities category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google and QR Code Reader · offer? v
Google: IAP range 7 tiers detected. QR Code Reader ·: IAP range 7 tiers detected. Google runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo)" monetization model; QR Code Reader · runs "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google or QR Code Reader ·? v
QR Code Reader · edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Google 4.5M ratings, QR Code Reader · 668K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google vs QR Code Reader · revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $58.61M for Google and $2.68M for QR Code Reader · are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Utilities) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google or QR Code Reader · to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.