GOV.UK ID Check vs VPNET - Fast Proxy Client
GOV.UK ID Check
Government Digital Service
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 392K installs
VS
VPNET - Fast Proxy Client
Green Meadow Media
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 3K installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
GOV.UK ID Check wins
+12951% vs other
MAU winner
GOV.UK ID Check wins
+12735% vs other
Rating winner
VPNET - Fast Proxy Client wins
+5% vs other
Why GOV.UK ID Check is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Bigger install base. GOV.UK ID Check has ~392K lifetime installs vs VPNET - Fast Proxy Client's ~3K - 130.5× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full GOV.UK ID Check report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
392K
◀
3K
Monthly active users (est.)?
47K
◀
363
App Store rating
4.76★
▶
5.00★
Total ratings
5K
◀
6
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 1, 2022
- Last updated
- Apr 9, 2026
- File size
- 27.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.52.0
- Languages
- English, CY
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 11, 2026
- Last updated
- Apr 23, 2026
- File size
- 89.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.420
- Languages
- English, Indonesian, Portuguese, Russian, Turkish
GOV.UK ID Check trajectory
VPNET - Fast Proxy Client trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, GOV.UK ID Check or VPNET - Fast Proxy Client? v
VPNET - Fast Proxy Client earns about $0 per month, while GOV.UK ID Check earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: GOV.UK ID Check ≈ $0/year, VPNET - Fast Proxy Client ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, GOV.UK ID Check or VPNET - Fast Proxy Client? v
GOV.UK ID Check leads with about 392K estimated downloads vs 3K for VPNET - Fast Proxy Client - a 130.5× gap. GOV.UK ID Check's App Store downloads are estimated from 5K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. VPNET - Fast Proxy Client's App Store downloads are estimated from 5 ratings.
Are GOV.UK ID Check and VPNET - Fast Proxy Client in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Utilities category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do GOV.UK ID Check and VPNET - Fast Proxy Client have in-app purchases? v
GOV.UK ID Check does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. VPNET - Fast Proxy Client does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: GOV.UK ID Check runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", VPNET - Fast Proxy Client runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, GOV.UK ID Check or VPNET - Fast Proxy Client? v
VPNET - Fast Proxy Client edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: GOV.UK ID Check 5K ratings, VPNET - Fast Proxy Client 5 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these GOV.UK ID Check vs VPNET - Fast Proxy Client revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for GOV.UK ID Check and $0 for VPNET - Fast Proxy Client are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Utilities) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare GOV.UK ID Check or VPNET - Fast Proxy Client to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
