GP World vs Plan to Eat
GP World
Gurdeep Walia
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 0 installs
VS
Plan to Eat
Plan To Eat, LLC
App Store
$8.6K/mo
~$103.0K/yr · 486K installs
Revenue winner
Plan to Eat wins
+858100% vs other
Installs winner
Plan to Eat wins
+48552000% vs other
MAU winner
Plan to Eat wins
+5777688% vs other
Rating winner
Plan to Eat wins
+484% vs other
Why Plan to Eat is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Plan to Eat earns roughly 8581× more per month than GP World - $8.6K vs $0.
- Aggressive pricing. Plan to Eat undercuts at $4.58/mo vs $17.34/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Plan to Eat has ~486K lifetime installs vs GP World's ~0 - 485520.0× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Plan to Eat sits at 4.84★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Plan to Eat report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
GP World
vs
Plan to Eat
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$8.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$103.0K
Lifetime installs (est.)
0
▶
486K
Monthly active users (est.)?
0
▶
58K
App Store rating
-
▶
4.84★
Total ratings
0
▶
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$17.34
◀
$4.58
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
=
1 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 5, 2022
- Last updated
- Apr 2, 2026
- File size
- 65.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.1.14
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- Jun 3, 2026
- File size
- 19.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.7.9
- Languages
- English
GP World trajectory
Plan to Eat trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, GP World or Plan to Eat? v
Plan to Eat earns about $8.6K per month, while GP World earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$8.6K more per month for Plan to Eat). Annual revenue: GP World ≈ $0/year, Plan to Eat ≈ $103.0K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, GP World or Plan to Eat? v
Plan to Eat leads with about 486K estimated downloads vs 0 for GP World - a ∞× gap. GP World's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Plan to Eat's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings.
Are GP World and Plan to Eat in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do GP World and Plan to Eat offer? v
GP World: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Plan to Eat: IAP range 1 tiers detected. GP World runs a "Subscription (~$17.34/mo)" monetization model; Plan to Eat runs "Subscription (~$4.58/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, GP World or Plan to Eat? v
Plan to Eat edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.8 stars). Rating volume: GP World 0 ratings, Plan to Eat 6K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these GP World vs Plan to Eat revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for GP World and $8.6K for Plan to Eat are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare GP World or Plan to Eat to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.