Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO vs Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO
The Happiest Baby, Inc.
App Store
$62.7K/mo
~$752.2K/yr · 396K installs
VS
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
Foodvisor
Google Play
$496.1K/mo
~$5.95M/yr · 10.2M installs
Revenue winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+691% vs other
Installs winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+2483% vs other
MAU winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+712% vs other
Rating winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+15% vs other
Why Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 8× more per month than Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO - $496.1K vs $62.7K.
- Premium pricing. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter charges $27.91/mo vs Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO's $19.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter has ~10.2M lifetime installs vs Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO's ~396K - 25.8× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter sits at 4.61★ vs 4.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$62.7K
▶
$496.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$752.2K
▶
$5.95M
Lifetime installs (est.)
396K
▶
10.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
97K
▶
788K
App Store rating
4.00★
▶
4.61★
Total ratings
5K
▶
151K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
▶
$27.91
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 10, 2022
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 72.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.10.4
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Spanish +1 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 8, 2018
- Last updated
- Mar 31, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 7.0.0-3
- Languages
- -
Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO trajectory
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO or Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns about $496.1K per month, while Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO earns about $62.7K. That is a 7.9× revenue gap (~$433.4K more per month for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO ≈ $752.2K/year, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter ≈ $5.95M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO or Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter leads with about 10.2M estimated downloads vs 396K for Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO - a 25.8× gap. Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO's App Store downloads are estimated from 5K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO and Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO and Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter offer? v
Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $6.49 - $119.99 per item. Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo)" monetization model; Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$27.91/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO or Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO 5K ratings, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO vs Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $62.7K for Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO and $496.1K for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Happiest Baby, makers of SNOO or Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
